↓ Skip to main content

Dysbindin (DTNBP1) variants are associated with hallucinations in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in European Psychiatry, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dysbindin (DTNBP1) variants are associated with hallucinations in schizophrenia
Published in
European Psychiatry, April 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) is a schizophrenia susceptibility gene involved with neurotransmission regulation (especially dopamine and glutamate) and neurodevelopment. The gene is known to be associated with cognitive deficit phenotypes within schizophrenia. In our previous studies, DTNBP1 was found associated not only with schizophrenia but with other psychiatric disorders including psychotic depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, nicotine dependence and opiate dependence. These findings suggest that DNTBP1 may be involved in pathways that lead to multiple psychiatric phenotypes. In this study, we explored the association between DTNBP1 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) and multiple psychiatric phenotypes included in the Diagnostic Interview of Psychosis (DIP).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 37 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,217,957
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from European Psychiatry
#1,170
of 2,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,227
of 373,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Psychiatry
#690
of 1,122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.