↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Unsupervised Methods to Size and Classify Suspended Particles Using Digital In-Line Holography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating Unsupervised Methods to Size and Classify Suspended Particles Using Digital In-Line Holography
Published in
Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, June 2015
DOI 10.1175/jtech-d-14-00157.1
Authors

Emlyn J. Davies, Daniel Buscombe, George W. Graham, W. Alex M. Nimmo-Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 19%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology
#1,447
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,020
of 281,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.