↓ Skip to main content

Eosinophil-associated Ribonuclease 11 Is a Macrophage Chemoattractant*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Eosinophil-associated Ribonuclease 11 Is a Macrophage Chemoattractant*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2015
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m114.626648
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNase A is the prototype of an extensive family of divergent proteins whose members share a unique disulfide-bonded tertiary structure, conserved catalytic motifs, and the ability to hydrolyze polymeric RNA. Several members of this family maintain independent roles as ribonucleases and modulators of innate immunity. Here we characterize mouse Ear 11, a divergent member of the eosinophil ribonuclease cluster, and the only known RNase A ribonuclease expressed specifically in response to Th2 cytokine stimulation. Mouse Ear 11 is differentially expressed in somatic tissues at baseline (brain < liver < lung < spleen); systemic stimulation with IL-33 results in 10 to 5000-fold increased expression in lung and spleen, respectively. Ear 11 is also expressed in response to protective priming of the respiratory mucosa with L. plantarum; transcripts are detected both locally in lung as well as systemically in bone marrow and spleen. Mouse Ear 11 is enzymatically active, although substantially less so than mEar 1 and mEar 2; the relative catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) of mEar 11 is diminished ~1000 - 1500-fold. However, in contrast to RNase 2/EDN and mEar 2, which have been characterized as selective chemoattractants for CD11c+ dendritic cells, mEar 11 has prominent chemoattractant activity for F4/80+CD11c- tissue macrophages. Chemoattractant activity is not dependent on full enzymatic activity, and requires no interaction with the pattern recognition receptor, toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Taken together, this work characterizes a divergent RNase A ribonuclease with a unique expression pattern and function, and highlights the versatility of this family in promoting innate immunity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Japan 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,874,146
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#76,893
of 86,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,751
of 270,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#272
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.