↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Proteomic approach and expression analysis revealed the differential expression of predicted leptospiral proteases capable of ECM degradation
Published in
BBA - Proteins & Proteomics, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Leptospira, the causative agent of leptospirosis is known to have many proteases with potential to degrade extracellular matrix. However, a multipronged approach to identify, classify, characterize and elucidate their role has not been attempted. Our proteomic approach using high-resolution LC-MS/MS analysis of Triton X-114 fractions of Leptospira interrogans resulted in the identification of 104 proteases out of 130 proteases predicted by MEROPS. In Leptospira approximately 3.5% of the genome complements for proteases, which include catalytic types of metallo-, serine-, cysteine-, aspartic-, threonine- and asparagine- peptidases. Comparison of proteases from different serovars revealed that M04, M09B, M14A, M75, M28A, A01 and U73 protease families are exclusively present in pathogenic form. The M23 and S33 protease families are represented with >14 members in Leptospira. The differential expression under physiological temperature (37 °C) and osmolarity (300 mOsM) showed that proteases belonging to the catalytic type of Metallo-peptidases are upregulated significantly in pathogenic conditions. In silico prediction and characterization of the proteases revealed that several proteases are membrane anchored and secretory, classical as well as non-classical system. The study demonstrates the diversity and complexity of proteases, while maintaining conservation across the serovars in Leptospira and their differential expression under pathogenic conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#27,900,690
of 34,560,275 outputs
Outputs from BBA - Proteins & Proteomics
#1,431
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,184
of 373,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BBA - Proteins & Proteomics
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.