↓ Skip to main content

CKD and Its Risk Factors among Patients with Cystinuria

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CKD and Its Risk Factors among Patients with Cystinuria
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, February 2015
DOI 10.2215/cjn.06680714
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cystinuria is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting renal cystine reabsorption; it causes 1% and 8% of stones in adults and children, respectively. This study aimed to determine epidemiologic and clinical characteristics as well as comorbidities among cystinuric patients, focusing on CKD and high BP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 35 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,095,260
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#2,521
of 4,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,043
of 297,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#31
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.