↓ Skip to main content

How Can Model Comparison Help Improving Species Distribution Models?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Can Model Comparison Help Improving Species Distribution Models?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Greece 2 1%
Czechia 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 120 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 48%
Environmental Science 47 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 12 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#28,634,793
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#183,879
of 224,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,686
of 239,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,367
of 5,343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.