↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Light on Cognitive Brain Responses Depend on Circadian Phase and Sleep Homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Rhythms, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of Light on Cognitive Brain Responses Depend on Circadian Phase and Sleep Homeostasis
Published in
Journal of Biological Rhythms, May 2011
DOI 10.1177/0748730411401736
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Light is a powerful modulator of cognition through its long-term effects on circadian rhythmicity and direct effects on brain function as identified by neuroimaging. How the direct impact of light on brain function varies with wavelength of light, circadian phase, and sleep homeostasis, and how this differs between individuals, is a largely unexplored area. Using functional MRI, we compared the effects of 1 minute of low-intensity blue (473 nm) and green light (527 nm) exposures on brain responses to an auditory working memory task while varying circadian phase and status of the sleep homeostat. Data were collected in 27 subjects genotyped for the PER3 VNTR (12 PER3(5/5) and 15 PER3(4/4) ) in whom it was previously shown that the brain responses to this task, when conducted in darkness, depend on circadian phase, sleep homeostasis, and genotype. In the morning after sleep, blue light, relative to green light, increased brain responses primarily in the ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and in the intraparietal sulcus, but only in PER3(4/4) individuals. By contrast, in the morning after sleep loss, blue light increased brain responses in a left thalamofrontoparietal circuit to a larger extent than green light, and only so in PER3(5/5) individuals. In the evening wake maintenance zone following a normal waking day, no differential effect of 1 minute of blue versus green light was observed in either genotype. Comparison of the current results with the findings observed in darkness indicates that light acts as an activating agent particularly under those circumstances in which and in those individuals in whom brain function is jeopardized by an adverse circadian phase and high homeostatic sleep pressure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 13%
Neuroscience 20 10%
Engineering 15 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2026.
All research outputs
#5,993,264
of 34,347,532 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#234
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,258
of 162,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,347,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.