↓ Skip to main content

Properties of nucleic acid staining dyes used in gel electrophoresis

Overview of attention for article published in Electrophoresis, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Properties of nucleic acid staining dyes used in gel electrophoresis
Published in
Electrophoresis, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/elps.201400496
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nucleic acid staining dyes are used for detecting nucleic acids in electrophoresis gels. Historically, the most common dye used for gel staining is ethidium bromide, however due to its toxicity and mutagenicity other dyes that are safer to the user and the environment are preferred. This Short Communication details the properties of dyes now available and their sensitivity for detection of DNA and their ability to permeate the cell membrane. It was found that GelRed™ was the most sensitive and safest dye to use with UV light excitation, and both GelGreen™ and Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye were sensitive and the safer dyes using blue light excitation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 25%
Student > Master 25 9%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 4%
Other 9 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 127 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 11%
Chemistry 19 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 132 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,548,827
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Electrophoresis
#55
of 5,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,009
of 295,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrophoresis
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.