↓ Skip to main content

Erythropoietin Exerts a Neuroprotective Function Against Glutamate Neurotoxicity in Experimental Diabetic RetinaEPO Protects Retina From Glutamate Toxicity in DR

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erythropoietin Exerts a Neuroprotective Function Against Glutamate Neurotoxicity in Experimental Diabetic RetinaEPO Protects Retina From Glutamate Toxicity in DR
Published in
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1167/iovs.14-14435
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Retinal neuronal cell dysfunction and even cell death are associated with increased excitotoxic glutamate (Glu) level in the retina. Our aim was to study a causative mechanism of Glu on retinal cell death and explore the neuroprotective role of erythropoietin (EPO) against Glu neurotoxicity in the diabetic retina.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#9,226,786
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#2,447
of 8,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,200
of 276,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#54
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.