Crosstalk between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts in physiological conditions and during disease remains poorly defined. Previous studies have shown that fibroblasts and myocytes interact via paracrine communication, but several experimental confounding factors, including the use of immature myocytes and the induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression in fibroblasts by prolonged culture, have hindered our understanding of this phenomenon. We hypothesize that fibroblasts and myofibroblasts differentially affect cardiomyocytes viability, volume, and Ca(2+) handling via soluble mediators. More specifically here: (i) we compare the effects of freshly isolated fibroblasts and cultured fibroblasts from normal rat hearts on adult cardiomyocytes; (ii) we compare the effects of (freshly isolated) normal fibroblasts and myofibroblasts from pressure-overloaded hearts; and (iii) we study the contribution of TGF-β and the importance of the crosstalk between the two cell types.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
5
2%
Other
10
4%
Unknown
69
27%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,901,963
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Research
#1,703
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,107
of 367,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Research
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
