You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding protected area resilience: a multi‐scale, social‐ecological approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/13-2113.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme S. Cumming, Craig R. Allen, Natalie C. Ban, Duan Biggs, Harry C. Biggs, David H. M. Cumming, Alta De Vos, Graham Epstein, Michel Etienne, Kristine Maciejewski, Raphaël Mathevet, Christine Moore, Mateja Nenadovic, Michael Schoon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 683 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 651 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 17% |
| Researcher | 115 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 121 | 18% |
| Unknown | 109 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 246 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 133 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 71 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 7% |
| Unknown | 147 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,600,438
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#693
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,262
of 274,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.