↓ Skip to main content

Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.007
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Myanmar 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 467 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 19%
Student > Bachelor 83 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 4%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 126 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 30%
Environmental Science 103 22%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 135 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,537,098
of 32,282,066 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,262
of 8,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,282
of 297,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#18
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,282,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.