↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp15x683941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 368 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Postgraduate 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Other 79 21%
Unknown 102 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Computer Science 27 7%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 109 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,489,424
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#637
of 5,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,115
of 297,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#7
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.