↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Evidence for Dynamic Social Impact: The Emergence of Subcultures in Electronic Groups

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Communication, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experimental Evidence for Dynamic Social Impact: The Emergence of Subcultures in Electronic Groups
Published in
Journal of Communication, February 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01503.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Professor 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 17%
Social Sciences 8 17%
Computer Science 5 11%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,150,419
of 28,036,136 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Communication
#1,217
of 1,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,379
of 185,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Communication
#409
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,036,136 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.