↓ Skip to main content

Interferon-λ rs12979860 genotype and liver fibrosis in viral and non-viral chronic liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interferon-λ rs12979860 genotype and liver fibrosis in viral and non-viral chronic liver disease
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7422
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tissue fibrosis is a core pathologic process that contributes to mortality in ~45% of the population and is likely to be influenced by the host genetic architecture. Here we demonstrate, using liver disease as a model, that a single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs12979860) in the intronic region of interferon-λ4 (IFNL4) is a strong predictor of fibrosis in an aetiology-independent manner. In a cohort of 4,172 patients, including 3,129 with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), 555 with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 488 with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), those with rs12979860CC have greater hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. In CHC, those with rs12979860CC also have greater stage-constant and stage-specific fibrosis progression rates (P<0.0001 for all). The impact of rs12979860 genotypes on fibrosis is maximal in young females, especially those with HCV genotype 3. These findings establish rs12979860 genotype as a strong aetiology-independent predictor of tissue inflammation and fibrosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 32 26%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,737,432
of 33,982,974 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#26,322
of 81,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,924
of 298,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#243
of 791 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,982,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 791 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.