↓ Skip to main content

Unconscious Biases: Racial Microaggressions in American Indian Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (formerly Journal of the American Board of Family Practice), March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unconscious Biases: Racial Microaggressions in American Indian Health Care
Published in
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (formerly Journal of the American Board of Family Practice), March 2015
DOI 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.140194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa L. Walls, John Gonzalez, Tanya Gladney, Emily Onello

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Psychology 19 11%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#548,114
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (formerly Journal of the American Board of Family Practice)
#57
of 2,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,317
of 300,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (formerly Journal of the American Board of Family Practice)
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.