↓ Skip to main content

Acute Rhabdomyolysis in a Patient with Long‐Term Exposure to Intrathecal Ziconotide: A Case Report

Overview of attention for article published in Pain Practice, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acute Rhabdomyolysis in a Patient with Long‐Term Exposure to Intrathecal Ziconotide: A Case Report
Published in
Pain Practice, January 2015
DOI 10.1111/papr.12273
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ziconotide is an intrathecally administered nonopioid analgesic for the treatment of severe chronic pain. Previous reports have noted rhabdomyolysis in patients receiving ziconotide during the initial single-shot trial or due to concurrent medical problems. We present a case of an acute rhabdomyolysis following an intrathecal bolus injection of ziconotide on a patient who had long-term exposure to the drug.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,459,032
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Pain Practice
#201
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,990
of 362,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain Practice
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.