↓ Skip to main content

Treatment responsiveness of phenotypes of symptomatic airways obstruction in adults

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Treatment responsiveness of phenotypes of symptomatic airways obstruction in adults
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Fingleton, Justin Travers, Mathew Williams, Thomas Charles, Darren Bowles, Rianne Strik, Philippa Shirtcliffe, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley, New Zealand Respiratory Health Survey Study Group, James Fingleton, Justin Travers, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley, Mathew Williams, Philippa Shirtcliffe, Thomas Charles, Darren Bowles, Irene Braithwaite, Rianne Strik, Natalie Dooney, Tanya Baker, Mitesh Patel, Mark Holliday, Maureen Stretch, Alison Pritchard, Denise Fabian, Claire Munro, Alexander Hosking, Alex Brinded, Gordon Purdie

Abstract

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are heterogeneous disorders encompassing different phenotypes of airflow obstruction, which might differ in their response to treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Tunisia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,202,955
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#4,100
of 14,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,652
of 299,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#49
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.