↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Stewardship Training for Infectious Diseases Fellows: Program Directors Identify a Curriculum Need

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
85 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antimicrobial Stewardship Training for Infectious Diseases Fellows: Program Directors Identify a Curriculum Need
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2018
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciy332
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A needs assessment survey of Infectious Diseases (ID) training program directors identified gaps concerning comprehensive and structured educational resources for training and evaluating ID fellows in antimicrobial stewardship. An IDSA-sponsored antimicrobial stewardship core curriculum was subsequently developed to address that need.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#980,527
of 32,967,084 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,690
of 20,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,170
of 342,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#26
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,967,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.