Congenital mirror movements (CMM) is a disorder characterized by unintentional mirroring in homologous motor systems of voluntary movements on the opposite side, usually affecting the distal upper extremities. Genetic analyses have revealed involvement of three genes (DCC, RAD51, and DNAL4). We sought to distinguish whether different phenotypes of CMM exist, and if so, whether they might map to different causative genes. We studied 14 individuals across five families with dominantly-inherited CMM. We used accelerometer gloves to analyse the fine detail of index finger tapping movements, and applied standard genetic methodology to analyse DNA samples. Two forms of mirroring were distinguished: 'actual' in which the mirroring followed precisely the movements of the voluntary hand, and 'fractionated' in which the mirroring was saccadic. We found that actual mirroring was characteristic of individuals in a family with a RAD51 mutation, and fractionated more characteristic of a family with a DCC mutation. These findings are suggestive of specific genotype-phenotype correlations in CMM. Three heterozygous individuals (one RAD51; two DCC) showed no apparent mirroring on visual inspection, although mirroring was detectable with the accelerometer gloves. Thus, subclinical mirroring may be present even when undetectable on clinical observation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,446,192
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#3,555
of 5,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,133
of 274,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#75
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
