↓ Skip to main content

True Nominalism: Referring versus Coding

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
True Nominalism: Referring versus Coding
Published in
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, September 2016
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axv004
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Greece 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,951,602
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#791
of 1,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,482
of 337,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.