| Title |
Current status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Surgery, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amilcare Parisi, Ninh T. Nguyen, Daniel Reim, Shu Zhang, Zhi-Wei Jiang, Steven T. Brower, Juan-Santiago Azagra, Olivier Facy, Orhan Alimoglu, Patrick G. Jackson, Hironori Tsujimoto, Yukinori Kurokawa, Lu Zang, Natalie G. Coburn, Pei-Wu Yu, Ben Zhang, Feng Qi, Andrea Coratti, Mario Annecchiarico, Alexander Novotny, Martine Goergen, Jean-Baptiste Lequeu, Tunc Eren, Metin Leblebici, Waddah Al-Refaie, Shuji Takiguchi, Junjun Ma, Yong-Liang Zhao, Tong Liu, Jacopo Desiderio |
| Abstract |
Gastric cancer represents a great challenge for health care providers and requires a multidisciplinary approach in which surgery plays the main role. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of laparoscopy and more recently with the spread of robotic surgery, but a number of issues are currently being investigate, including the limitations in performing effective extended lymph node dissections and, in this context, the real advantages of using robotic systems, the possible role for advanced Gastric Cancer, the reproducibility of completely intracorporeal techniques and the oncological results achievable during follow-up. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Colombia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |