| Title |
Systemic administration of epothilone B promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaa2958 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
After central nervous system (CNS) injury, inhibitory factors in the lesion scar and poor axon growth potential prevent axon regeneration. Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and promotes axon growth. However, the cellular mechanisms of this dual effect remain unclear. Here, delayed systemic administration of a blood-brain barrier permeable microtubule stabilizing drug, epothilone B (epoB), decreased scarring after rodent spinal cord injury (SCI) by abrogating polarization and directed migration of scar-forming fibroblasts. Conversely, epothilone B reactivated neuronal polarization by inducing concerted microtubule polymerization into the axon tip, which propelled axon growth through an inhibitory environment. Together, these drug elicited effects promoted axon regeneration and improved motor function after SCI. With recent clinical approval, epothilones hold promise for clinical use after CNS injury. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 384 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 24% |
| Researcher | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 92 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 9% |
| Engineering | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 24% |