↓ Skip to main content

Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology, transient risk, and intervention assessment.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, December 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology, transient risk, and intervention assessment.
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, December 1993
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To integrate information from the various disciplines that contribute to the understanding of the cause and prevention of sudden cardiac death: identification of new approaches from applied clinical epidemiology; identification and control of transient risk factors; and evaluation of the results of interventions. A broad range of research reports and interpretations of data from English-language journal articles and reviews, published primarily between 1970 and 1993. The fields of study included epidemiology, experimental electrophysiology, clinical observations, and interventions. Continuous literature surveys, done in relation to ongoing clinical and experimental research on sudden cardiac death since 1972. Included on the basis of relevance to the topics discussed and with confirmation of data and concepts by more than one investigator when available. Information from several disciplines was integrated by the authors to synthesize new ways to view the problem of sudden cardiac death. Quantitative information was used primarily to derive qualitative statements about new perspectives on sudden cardiac death. Progress in the prevention of sudden death will require development of new approaches, including epidemiologic techniques to address risk characteristics specific to the problem; characterization of triggering events and identification of specific persons at risk for responding adversely to these events; and methods of evaluating outcomes appropriate to the nature of sudden cardiac death.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 48%
Engineering 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2024.
All research outputs
#2,986,336
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#5,975
of 16,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,300
of 102,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.