You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geographic variation in migration chronology and winter distribution of midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.573 |
Authors |
Craig R. Ely, Daniel J. Nieman, Ray T. Alisauskas, Joel A. Schmutz, James E. Hines |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 61% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 24% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#938
of 2,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,860
of 206,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.