↓ Skip to main content

Measurement of total iron in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric epithelial cells

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measurement of total iron in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric epithelial cells
Published in
BioMetals, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10534-014-9810-z
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite the evidence suggesting a role for Helicobacter pylori in the induction of systemic iron deficiency anaemia, little is known about the possibility of infection-associated changes in cellular iron homeostasis at the gastric epithelium. In this study we compared four different techniques for measuring iron in AGS cells, a gastric epithelial cell line that is widely used to model to H. pylori infection in vitro. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry proved to be an efficient method, but only when large numbers of cells were used. Two colorimetric assays that included the use of concentrated hydrochloric acid with or without potassium ferrocyanide detected iron in the micromolar but not the nanomolar range in cell-free standards. However, the third colorimetric assay that incorporated ferrozine proved to be highly accurate at detecting iron in the nanomolar range, and was able to detect iron in AGS cells, Moreover, using this assay, we were able to show that the level of iron in H. pylori-infected AGS cells is significantly increased when compared to uninfected cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Chemistry 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,326,126
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#382
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,366
of 361,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.