↓ Skip to main content

Climate Change and the Integrity of Science

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
20 blogs
twitter
168 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
11 Google+ users
reddit
11 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Climate Change and the Integrity of Science
Published in
Science, May 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.328.5979.689
Pubmed ID
Authors

P H Gleick, R M Adams, R M Amasino, E Anders, D J Anderson, W W Anderson, L E Anselin, M K Arroyo, B Asfaw, F J Ayala, A Bax, A J Bebbington, G Bell, M V L Bennett, J L Bennetzen, M R Berenbaum, O B Berlin, P J Bjorkman, E Blackburn, J E Blamont, M R Botchan, J S Boyer, E A Boyle, D Branton, S P Briggs, W R Briggs, W J Brill, R J Britten, W S Broecker, J H Brown, P O Brown, A T Brunger, J Cairns, D E Canfield, S R Carpenter, J C Carrington, A R Cashmore, J C Castilla, A Cazenave, F S Chapin, A J Ciechanover, D E Clapham, W C Clark, R N Clayton, M D Coe, E M Conwell, E B Cowling, R M Cowling, C S Cox, R B Croteau, D M Crothers, P J Crutzen, G C Daily, G B Dalrymple, J L Dangl, S A Darst, D R Davies, M B Davis, P V De Camilli, C Dean, R S DeFries, J Deisenhofer, D P Delmer, E F DeLong, D J DeRosier, T O Diener, R Dirzo, J E Dixon, M J Donoghue, R F Doolittle, T Dunne, P R Ehrlich, S N Eisenstadt, T Eisner, K A Emanuel, S W Englander, W G Ernst, P G Falkowski, G Feher, J A Ferejohn, A Fersht, E H Fischer, R Fischer, K V Flannery, J Frank, P A Frey, I Fridovich, C Frieden, D J Futuyma, W R Gardner, C J R Garrett, W Gilbert, R B Goldberg, W H Goodenough, C S Goodman, M Goodman, P Greengard, S Hake, G Hammel, S Hanson, S C Harrison, S R Hart, D L Hartl, R Haselkorn, K Hawkes, J M Hayes, B Hille, T Hökfelt, J S House, M Hout, D M Hunten, I A Izquierdo, A T Jagendorf, D H Janzen, R Jeanloz, C S Jencks, W A Jury, H R Kaback, T Kailath, P Kay, S A Kay, D Kennedy, A Kerr, R C Kessler, G S Khush, S W Kieffer, P V Kirch, K Kirk, M G Kivelson, J P Klinman, A Klug, L Knopoff, H Kornberg, J E Kutzbach, J C Lagarias, K Lambeck, A Landy, C H Langmuir, B A Larkins, X T Le Pichon, R E Lenski, E B Leopold, S A Levin, M Levitt, G E Likens, J Lippincott-Schwartz, L Lorand, C O Lovejoy, M Lynch, A L Mabogunje, T F Malone, S Manabe, J Marcus, D S Massey, J C McWilliams, E Medina, H J Melosh, D J Meltzer, C D Michener, E L Miles, H A Mooney, P B Moore, F M M Morel, E S Mosley-Thompson, B Moss, W H Munk, N Myers, G B Nair, J Nathans, E W Nester, R A Nicoll, R P Novick, J F O'Connell, P E Olsen, N D Opdyke, G F Oster, E Ostrom, N R Pace, R T Paine, R D Palmiter, J Pedlosky, G A Petsko, G H Pettengill, S G Philander, D R Piperno, T D Pollard, P B Price, P A Reichard, B F Reskin, R E Ricklefs, R L Rivest, J D Roberts, A K Romney, M G Rossmann, D W Russell, W J Rutter, J A Sabloff, R Z Sagdeev, M D Sahlins, A Salmond, J R Sanes, R Schekman, J Schellnhuber, D W Schindler, J Schmitt, S H Schneider, V L Schramm, R R Sederoff, C J Shatz, F Sherman, R L Sidman, K Sieh, E L Simons, B H Singer, M F Singer, B Skyrms, N H Sleep, B D Smith, S H Snyder, R R Sokal, C S Spencer, T A Steitz, K B Strier, T C Südhof, S S Taylor, J Terborgh, D H Thomas, L G Thompson, R T Tjian, M G Turner, S Uyeda, J W Valentine, J S Valentine, J L Van Etten, K E van Holde, M Vaughan, S Verba, P H von Hippel, D B Wake, A Walker, J E Walker, E B Watson, P J Watson, D Weigel, S R Wessler, M J West-Eberhard, T D White, W J Wilson, R V Wolfenden, J A Wood, G M Woodwell, H E Wright, C Wu, C Wunsch, M L Zoback

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Brazil 6 2%
Mexico 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 317 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 15%
Professor 42 12%
Student > Master 30 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 8%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 48 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 32%
Environmental Science 45 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 6%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 54 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 309. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#138,028
of 34,245,361 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,126
of 93,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300
of 149,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#11
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,245,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.