↓ Skip to main content

Midwives׳ clinical reasoning during second stage labour: Report on an interpretive study

Overview of attention for article published in Midwifery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Midwives׳ clinical reasoning during second stage labour: Report on an interpretive study
Published in
Midwifery, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

clinical reasoning was once thought to be the exclusive domain of medicine - setting it apart from 'non-scientific' occupations like midwifery. Poor assessment, clinical reasoning and decision-making skills are well known contributors to adverse outcomes in maternity care. Midwifery decision-making models share a common deficit: they are insufficiently detailed to guide reasoning processes for midwives in practice. For these reasons we wanted to explore if midwives actively engaged in clinical reasoning processes within their clinical practice and if so to what extent. The study was conducted using post structural, feminist methodology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Lecturer 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,131,130
of 26,860,135 outputs
Outputs from Midwifery
#1,473
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,758
of 364,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Midwifery
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,860,135 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.