↓ Skip to main content

The Radiative Signature of Upper Tropospheric Moistening

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
reddit
7 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Radiative Signature of Upper Tropospheric Moistening
Published in
Science, October 2005
DOI 10.1126/science.1115602
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Climate models predict that the concentration of water vapor in the upper troposphere could double by the end of the century as a result of increases in greenhouse gases. Such moistening plays a key role in amplifying the rate at which the climate warms in response to anthropogenic activities, but has been difficult to detect because of deficiencies in conventional observing systems. We use satellite measurements to highlight a distinct radiative signature of upper tropospheric moistening over the period 1982 to 2004. The observed moistening is accurately captured by climate model simulations and lends further credence to model projections of future global warming.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Switzerland 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 161 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Master 19 11%
Professor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 85 49%
Environmental Science 23 13%
Engineering 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,708,027
of 34,147,617 outputs
Outputs from Science
#25,884
of 93,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,732
of 101,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#58
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,147,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.