↓ Skip to main content

Phytosulfokine Is Involved in Positive Regulation of Lotus japonicus Nodulation.

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phytosulfokine Is Involved in Positive Regulation of Lotus japonicus Nodulation.
Published in
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, July 2015
DOI 10.1094/mpmi-02-15-0032-r
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Phytosulfokine (PSK) is a tyrosine-sulfated peptide that is widely distributed in plants, participating in cell proliferation, differentiation and innate immunity. The potential role of PSKs in nodulation in legumes has not been reported. In this work, five PSK precursor genes were identified in Lotus japonicas, designated as LjPSK1-5. Three of them (LjPSK1, LjPSK4 and LjPSK5) were found to be expressed in nitrogen-fixing root nodules. LjPSK1 and LjPSK4 were not induced at the early stage of nodulation. Interestingly, while the expression of LjPSK4 was also found in spontaneous nodules without rhizobial colonization, LjPSK1 was not induced in these pseudo nodules. Promoter-GUS analysis revealed that LjPSK1 was highly expressed in enlarged symbiotic cells of nodules. Exogenous addition of 1 μM synthetic PSK peptide resulted in increased nodule numbers per plant. Consistently, the number of mature nodules, but not the events of rhizobial infection and nodule initiation, was increased by overexpressing LjPSK1 in transgenic hairy roots, where the expression of jasmonate responsive genes was found to be repressed. These results suggest that PSK is a new peptide signal that regulates nodulation in legumes, probably through cross-talking with other phytohormones.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 31%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#23,436,833
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
#2,028
of 2,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,211
of 300,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.