↓ Skip to main content

Associations between workplace factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: A multi‐site cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Industrial Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Associations between workplace factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: A multi‐site cross sectional study
Published in
American Journal of Industrial Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/ajim.22443
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Few large epidemiologic studies have used rigorous case criteria, individual-level exposure measurements, and appropriate control for confounders to examine associations between workplace psychosocial and biomechanical factors and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 44 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 23%
Engineering 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 51 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,305,980
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Industrial Medicine
#654
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,751
of 297,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Industrial Medicine
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.