↓ Skip to main content

Systems engineering meets quantitative systems pharmacology: from low‐level targets to engaging the host defenses

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systems engineering meets quantitative systems pharmacology: from low‐level targets to engaging the host defenses
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/wsbm.1294
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quantitative systems pharmacology aims at systematizing, in a model-based manner, the integration of systems biology and pharmacology in an effort to rationalize the process of assessing the ability of a drug to enhance well-being by off-setting the effects of a disease. Systems engineering, on the other hand, has enabled us to develop principles and methodologies for designing and operating engineered networks of structures exploring the integration of the underlying governing (design) laws. Although the computational tools which have resulted in major advances in the design, analysis, and operation of complex engineered structures have had tremendous success in the analysis of systems pharmacology models, it is argued in this opinion paper, that exploring the underlying conceptual foundation of complex systems engineering will enable us to move toward integrated models at the host level to explore, and possibly, induce synergies between low-level drug targets and higher level, systemic, defense mechanisms. This is an approach which would require refocusing of the key activities; however, it is likely the more promising approach as we enter the new era of personalized and precision medicine. We finally argue for the development of an allostatic approach to quantitative systems pharmacology and the development of an integrated framework for considering drugs in their broader context, beyond their local site of action. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Engineering 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 11 33%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#24,992,549
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine
#37
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,791
of 280,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.