Responsiveness to Threats and Incentives, Expectancy of Recurrence, and Distress and Disengagement: Moderator Effects in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 2000
Models of neurobiological systems linking personality, motivation, and emotion can be integrated with the expectancy construct to suggest hypotheses about distress and giving up in response to adversity. In 220 women with breast cancer, threat responsiveness-sensitivity of the behavioral inhibition system (BIS)-and incentive responsiveness-sensitivity of the behavioral activation system (BAS)-and expectancies about cancer recurrence were measured. It was predicted and found that high BIS sensitivity interacted with recurrence expectancy to predict elevated distress and disengagement. Low BAS sensitivity (reward responsiveness) also interacted with expectancy of recurrence to predict elevated disengagement. In contrast, high BAS sensitivity (fun seeking) interacted with recurrence expectancy to predict elevated distress. Discussion centers on theoretical implications and possible applications.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#3,228
of 4,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,243
of 109,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#95
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
