↓ Skip to main content

The Decision to Access Patient Information From a Social Media Site: What Would You Do?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Adolescent Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Decision to Access Patient Information From a Social Media Site: What Would You Do?
Published in
Journal of Adolescent Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study examined the prevalence with which healthcare providers use a social media site (SMS) account (e.g., Facebook), the extent to which they use SMSs in clinical practice, and their decision-making process after accessing patient information from an SMS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
New Zealand 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Psychology 18 11%
Computer Science 16 10%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 8%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2017.
All research outputs
#505,467
of 30,006,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescent Health
#306
of 5,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,598
of 135,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescent Health
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,006,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.