↓ Skip to main content

Older People with Access to Hand-Held Devices: Who Are They?

Overview of attention for article published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Older People with Access to Hand-Held Devices: Who Are They?
Published in
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, July 2015
DOI 10.1089/tmj.2014.0103
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multiple comorbid conditions among older patients require frequent physician office and emergency room visits, at times leading to hospitalization. In recent years, mobile health (m-health) systems utilizing hand-held devices (e.g., smartphones) have been developed, which could be used for health-related interventions. This study investigates sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who have or have not accessed Internet via hand-held devices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Computer Science 11 10%
Psychology 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#11,178,529
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#893
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,549
of 302,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.