↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated with Infection Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Factors Associated with Infection Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published in
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, March 2015
DOI 10.2106/jbjs.n.00694
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although rare, infection can be devastating after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to test the association between infection after ACL reconstruction and potential risk factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, and graft choice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 51 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,275,031
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
#2,271
of 7,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,229
of 322,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
#24
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.