↓ Skip to main content

Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Published in
World Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2013
DOI 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.6979
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies have the potential to disseminate and grow in the peritoneal cavity. The occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has been shown to significantly decrease overall survival in patients with liver and/or extraperitoneal metastases from gastrointestinal cancer. During the last three decades, the understanding of the biology and pathways of dissemination of tumors with intraperitoneal spread, and the understanding of the protective function of the peritoneal barrier against tumoral seeding, has prompted the concept that PC is a loco-regional disease: in absence of other systemic metastases, multimodal approaches combining aggressive cytoreductive surgery, intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy have been proposed and are actually considered promising methods to improve loco-regional control of the disease, and ultimately to increase survival. The aim of this review article is to present the evidence on treatment of PC in different tumors, in order to provide patients with a proper surgical and multidisciplinary treatment focused on optimal control of their locoregional disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Unknown 277 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Other 23 8%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 92 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 106 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,772,833
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Gastroenterology
#696
of 9,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,685
of 327,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Gastroenterology
#58
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.