↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Monoclonal paraprotein influences baseline B-cell repertoire diversity and perturbates influenza vaccination-induced B-cell response
Published in
Experimental Hematology, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.02.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) arises from a clonal expansion of plasma cells in the bone marrow, secreting monoclonal (M) paraprotein. MGUS is associated with increased susceptibility to infections, which may reflect altered B-cell repertoire. To investigate this, we examined the IgM, IgG and IgA B-cell repertoire diversity in MGUS at baseline and after influenza vaccination (n=16) in comparison to healthy controls (HCs) (n=16). The CDR3 region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) region gene was amplified and B-cell spectratypes analyzed by high-resolution electrophoresis. Spectratype Gaussian distribution, kurtosis and skewness were quantified to measure repertoire shifts. Both HC and MGUS baseline spectratypes show inter-individual variability that is more pronounced in the IGHG and IGHA repertoires. Overall, baseline B cell repertoire is more altered in MGUS, with oligoclonality observed in 50% (p=0.01). Post-vaccination, significant differences emerged in MGUS in relation to M-protein levels. High M-protein concentration is associated with a more oligoclonal IgG and IgA response at day 7 post-vaccination, and in contrast to HCs, vaccination also induced significant perturbations in the MGUS IgM repertoire at day 7 (p=0.005). Monoclonal expansion in MGUS thus has an effect on the baseline B cell repertoire and influences the recruited repertoire upon vaccination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Psychology 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Hematology
#1,309
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,097
of 291,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Hematology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.