↓ Skip to main content

Training-induced plasticity of the social brain in autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Training-induced plasticity of the social brain in autism spectrum disorder
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.143784
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is linked to social brain activity and facial affect recognition (FAR). Aims To examine social brain plasticity in ASD. Method Using FAR tests and functional magnetic resonance imaging tasks for FAR, we compared 32 individuals with ASD and 25 controls. Subsequently, the participants with ASD were assigned to FAR computer-aided cognitive training or a control group. Results The ASD group performed more poorly than controls on explicit behavioural FAR tests. In the scanner, during implicit FAR, the amygdala, fusiform gyrus and other regions of the social brain were less activated bilaterally. The training group improved on behavioural FAR tests, and cerebral response to implicit affect processing tasks increased bilaterally post-training in the social brain. Conclusions Individuals with ASD show FAR impairments associated with hypoactivation of the social brain. Computer-based training improves explicit FAR and neuronal responses during implicit FAR, indicating neuroplasticity in the social brain in ASD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 59 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 26%
Neuroscience 34 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,156,063
of 27,374,586 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,214
of 6,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,757
of 457,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#873
of 5,487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,374,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.