↓ Skip to main content

Labor Analgesia Consumption and Time to Neuraxial Catheter Placement in Women with a History of Surgical Correction for Scoliosis

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Labor Analgesia Consumption and Time to Neuraxial Catheter Placement in Women with a History of Surgical Correction for Scoliosis
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, October 2015
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000000690
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neuraxial analgesic techniques are the most effective form of labor analgesia. Small studies (9-21 patients), conducted 10 to 20 years ago, demonstrated successful neuraxial labor analgesia in only 50% to 66% of patients with surgical correction for scoliosis. Newer surgical techniques for scoliosis correction make the epidural space more accessible, but postsurgical changes may still alter the efficacy of neuraxial labor analgesia. The purpose of this prospective case-matched study was to compare hourly bupivacaine consumption and time to placement of neuraxial technique in laboring women with spinal instrumentation compared with women without previous back surgery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,832
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,770
of 311,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#56
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.