↓ Skip to main content

Relatives’ and staff’s experience of patients dying in ICU

Overview of attention for article published in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relatives’ and staff’s experience of patients dying in ICU
Published in
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1093/qjmed/hcv059
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

ICUs exist to support patients through acute illness that threatens their life. Although ICUs aim to save life, they are also a place where a significant proportion of patients will die with international mortality rates ranging from 15-24%.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,054,527
of 27,377,461 outputs
Outputs from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#800
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,175
of 279,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,377,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.