↓ Skip to main content

Detection of stoichiometric inconsistencies in biomolecular models

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Detection of stoichiometric inconsistencies in biomolecular models
Published in
Bioinformatics, August 2008
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn425
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Metabolic modelling provides a mathematically rigorous basis for system-level analysis of biochemical networks. However, the growing sizes of metabolic models can lead to serious problems in their construction and validation. In this work, we describe a relatively poorly investigated type of modelling error, called stoichiometric inconsistencies. These errors are caused by incorrect definitions of reaction stoichiometries and result in conflicts between two fundamental physical constraints to be satisfied by any valid metabolic model: positivity of molecular masses of all metabolites and mass conservation in all interconversions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 5 4%
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 116 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 29%
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 18%
Computer Science 16 12%
Engineering 10 7%
Mathematics 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,989,762
of 28,731,329 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#4,052
of 13,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,934
of 113,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#20
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,731,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.