↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of dengue in a high-income country: a case study in Queensland, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epidemiology of dengue in a high-income country: a case study in Queensland, Australia
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-379
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Australia is one of the few high-income countries where dengue transmission regularly occurs. Dengue is a major health threat in North Queensland (NQ), where the vector Aedes aegypti is present. Whether NQ should be considered as a dengue endemic or epidemic region is an ongoing debate. To help address this issue, we analysed the characteristics of locally-acquired (LA) and imported dengue cases in NQ through time and space. We describe the epidemiology of dengue in NQ from 1995 to 2011, to identify areas to target interventions. We also investigated the timeliness of notification and identified high-risk areas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 9 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 50 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,960,251
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#589
of 6,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,206
of 251,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#14
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.