↓ Skip to main content

A bimodality trap in model projections

Overview of attention for article published in Chaos, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A bimodality trap in model projections
Published in
Chaos, March 2015
DOI 10.1063/1.4915090
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We expose a phenomenon that can occur in the process of joint state and parameter estimation. Such estimation is crucial in tuning parameters for climate models and offline parameterizations used in the models. We show how a bimodal distribution can temporarily appear during this process and that a scheme relying on linear and Gaussian approximations may cause it to get trapped in the wrong mode and hence lead to faulty estimation. We propose a practical and effective resolution using a two-stage filtering process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#31,339,694
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Chaos
#2,937
of 3,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,103
of 307,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chaos
#41
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.