↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Tranexamic Acid in Joint Replacement Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Orthopaedic Nursing, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Use of Tranexamic Acid in Joint Replacement Surgery
Published in
Orthopaedic Nursing, March 2015
DOI 10.1097/nor.0000000000000125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Suggs, Karyn Holt

Abstract

Perioperative bleeding is a prevalent risk of elective joint replacement surgery that can lead to allogeneic blood transfusions, delayed discharge, and slowed physical therapy progress. Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid (TXA) have been used in various surgical procedures to reduce bleeding; however, the use of TXA in orthopaedic surgery is not widespread. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the use of TXA in joint replacement surgery reduces total blood loss and lowers the need for allogeneic blood transfusions without adding additional surgical risk and cost. All reviewed meta analyses and systematic reviews analyzed did show a statistically significant reduction in total blood loss and reduction in the need for allogeneic blood transfusions. Therefore, researchers conclude that intravenous TXA use does decrease total blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion needs. Thus, its use should be included in orthopaedic clinical practice guidelines due to its overall positive effect on outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 35%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,588,344
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from Orthopaedic Nursing
#80
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,575
of 273,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopaedic Nursing
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.