↓ Skip to main content

The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, October 2010
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.1911
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mechanism by which newly synthesized histones are imported into the nucleus and deposited onto replicating chromatin alongside segregating nucleosomal counterparts is poorly understood, yet this program is expected to bear on the putative epigenetic nature of histone post-translational modifications. To define the events by which naive pre-deposition histones are imported into the nucleus, we biochemically purified and characterized the full gamut of histone H3.1-containing complexes from human cytoplasmic fractions and identified their associated histone post-translational modifications. Through reconstitution assays, biophysical analyses and live cell manipulations, we describe in detail this series of events, namely the assembly of H3-H4 dimers, the acetylation of histones by the HAT1 holoenzyme and the transfer of histones between chaperones that culminates with their karyopherin-mediated nuclear import. We further demonstrate the high degree of conservation for this pathway between higher and lower eukaryotes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 249 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 26%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 27%
Chemistry 6 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 47 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#5,642,388
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#1,764
of 3,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,285
of 145,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.