↓ Skip to main content

The CSC is required for complete radial spoke assembly and wild-type ciliary motility

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology of the Cell, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The CSC is required for complete radial spoke assembly and wild-type ciliary motility
Published in
Molecular Biology of the Cell, May 2011
DOI 10.1091/mbc.e11-03-0271
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ubiquitous calcium binding protein, calmodulin (CaM), plays a major role in regulating the motility of all eukaryotic cilia and flagella. We previously identified a CaM and Spoke associated Complex (CSC) and provided evidence that this complex mediates regulatory signals between the radial spokes and dynein arms. We have now used an artificial microRNA (amiRNA) approach to reduce expression of two CSC subunits in Chlamydomonas. For all amiRNA mutants, the entire CSC is lacking or severely reduced in flagella. Structural studies of mutant axonemes revealed that assembly of radial spoke 2 is defective. Furthermore, analysis of both flagellar beating and microtubule sliding in vitro demonstrates that the CSC plays a critical role in modulating dynein activity. Our results not only indicate that the CSC is required for spoke assembly and wild-type motility, but also provide evidence for heterogeneity among the radial spokes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 24%
Mathematics 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology of the Cell
#4,155
of 5,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,613
of 123,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology of the Cell
#32
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.