↓ Skip to main content

NMDA Blockade Inhibits Experience-Dependent Modification of Anterior Thalamic Head Direction Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NMDA Blockade Inhibits Experience-Dependent Modification of Anterior Thalamic Head Direction Cells
Published in
Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1037/bne0000047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura E. Berkowitz, Isaac Ybarra, Jessicah A. Jones, Michele E. Amato, Annette M. Rodriguez, Jeffrey L. Calton

Abstract

Head Direction (HD) cells of the rodent Papez circuit are thought to reflect the spatial orientation of the animal. Because NMDA transmission is important for spatial behavior, we sought to determine the effects of NMDA blockade on the basic directional signal carried by HD cells and on experience-dependent modification of this system. In Experiment 1, HD cells were recorded from the anterior dorsal thalamus in female Long-Evans rats while they foraged in a familiar enclosure following administration of the NMDA antagonist CPP or saline. While the drug produced a significant decrease in peak firing rates, it failed to affect the overall directional specificity and landmark control of HD cells. Experiment 2 took place over 2 days and assessed whether the NMDA antagonist would interfere with the stabilization of the HD network in a novel environment. On Day 1 the animal was administered CPP or saline and placed in a novel enclosure to allow the stabilization of the HD signal relative to the new environmental landmarks. On Day 2 the animal was returned to the formerly novel enclosure to determine if the enclosure specific direction-dependent activity established on Day 1 was maintained. In contrast to HD cells from control animals, cells from animals receiving CPP during the initial exposure to the novel enclosure did not maintain the same direction-dependent activity relative to the enclosure in the subsequent drug-free exposure. These findings demonstrate that plasticity in the HD system is dependent on NMDA transmission similar to many other forms of spatial learning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Neuroscience
#704
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,150
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Neuroscience
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.