Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is generally recognised as a disorder with presenile onset (that is before 65 years of age) with only occasional cases presenting later than this. We set out to determine what proportion of cases of FTLD had late onset of disease and whether such cases of FTLD had distinctive clinical and neuropathological features as compared to cases with presenile onset. Within a combined Manchester and Newcastle autopsy series of 117 cases with pathologically confirmed FTLD (109/117 cases also met Lund Manchester clinical criteria for FTLD), we identified 30 cases (onset age range 65-86 years), comprising 25% of all FTLD cases ascertained in these two centres over a 25-year period. Neuropathologically, the 30 elderly cases presented features of several FTLD histological subgroups [FTLD-TDP (types 1, 2 and 3, 19 cases (63%)], FLTD-tau [MAPT, PiD and CBD, 10 cases (33%)] and FTLD-UPS (1 case), similar in range of phenotypes to that seen in the presenile group, though patients with MAPT, but not PGRN, mutation, or FUS pathology, were notably absent or fewer in the elderly group. Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) was present in 13/30 of the elderly FTLD cases (43%) compared with 14/79 (18%) (P = 0.012) in the presenile FTLD patients. Lobar atrophy present in most of the younger patients was prominent in only 25% of the elderly subjects. Prospective and retrospective psychiatric and medical case note analysis showed that the majority of the elderly FTLD patients, like their younger counterparts, had behavioural features consistent with frontotemporal dementia. FTLD is common amongst elderly persons and all or most of the major clinical and histological subtypes present in younger individuals can be seen in the older group.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,089
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,273
of 99,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
