↓ Skip to main content

Looped Versus Single-Stranded Flexor Tendon Repairs: A Cadaveric Mechanical Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Looped Versus Single-Stranded Flexor Tendon Repairs: A Cadaveric Mechanical Study
Published in
Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare the tensile properties of 4-strand modified Kessler flexor tendon repairs using a looped or single-stranded suture.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Other 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 44%
Engineering 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#21,903,866
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition
#2,250
of 4,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,023
of 306,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition
#22
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.